Sunday, January 27, 2008

Obama may have won the battle, but the war?

To CBSNews.com senior political editor Vaughn Ververs, the numbers behind the numbers tell the real story. Divisive racial politics may have helped Obama carry South Carolina, where African-Americans were 53% of the vote. But the same divide will cost Obama dearly on Super Tuesday, when the white Democratic majority registers its opinion. According to Vevers:

"Not presidential" is how former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle described Bill Clinton's behavior on the campaign trail of late. All the same, it may be effective. Clinton's campaign is aimed at capturing voters who make up a huge part of the Democratic demographic: Middle class, white, female, older. Those are the voters who may shy away from backing a "black" candidate, as they have in earlier contests in this race. Despite his huge margin of victory, Obama captured just a quarter of white voters [emphasis added].

And the nasty tactics had another purpose - to knock the candidate of "hope" off the mountaintop and down into the gutters of hardball politics. Forcing the man who has sought to connect himself to the legacy of inspirational leaders of the nation's past (he announced his candidacy in the shadow of Abraham Lincoln) to trade blows and accusations with Bill Clinton on the divisive issue of race only serves to muddy both. And there's some evidence that it worked. Fifty-eight percent of South Carolina voters said they felt Obama unfairly attacked Clinton during the campaign.

No comments: