Implementation of the [Lebanon ceasefire] resolution will depend to a large degree on the Syrians . . . The more determined Syria is to frustrate implementation of the resolution, the more the international force will need a capability and a mandate to be aggressive in stopping efforts to get arms to Hezbollah and in preventing its restoration as a fighting force. . .
[T]here should be no illusions. History is full of good resolutions on Lebanon that have not been implemented because the Syrians had the power to block them. . .
[We should] take advantage of the new basis that exists to exercise much more leverage on Syria this time. Consider that the French and other Europeans will now be putting forces on the ground in Lebanon. If Hezbollah is being resupplied with arms and can be reconstituted militarily, those forces will become very vulnerable. That gives the French a powerful stake in preventing Hezbollah from rearming.
Working in tandem, the Bush administration and the French should try to change the Syrian calculus. Syria sees Hezbollah as a card -- something to be exploited to make Syria a factor in the region or to be traded in the right circumstances. We should create a one-two punch with the French to make clear that Syria has something significant to lose by not cutting off Hezbollah, and that it has something meaningful to gain from changing course. . .
In such a scenario, the European Union would be Act 1. Act 2 would involve the United States. The Bush administration, which has expressed an interest in weaning Syria away from Iran, won't be able to do that without talking to the Syrians. . .
[T]he Syrians would want to know what they'd get from such cooperation. They should be told that the page can be turned in our relations, that economic benefits could be forthcoming, and that even a resumption of the peace process between Syria and Israel on the Golan Heights could be in the offing.
Thursday, August 17, 2006
Dealing With Syria
Dennis Ross played a central role in Arab-Israeli policy under Bush 41 and under Clinton. He sees, correctly I believe, an opening for improving relations in the region by working through Syria. Excerpts from his Washington Post commentary follow:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment